![]() ![]() This is part of the advantage of the DIY approach - you can build something specifically for your rig without having to worry about whether it would work as well in any other rig. ![]() The passive circuit can be designed into a specific system if the specific system is permanently defined. The active circuit will be best suited as a general solution, like what would be sold commercially when the goal is to make it compatible with most any kind of equipment. It depends whether this is a permanent installation or if he wants some flexibility if he later changes something out. There may be value in making a tool that doesn't depend on the drive strength of upstream equipment. The most hi-fi amp you can use is none at all. The passive option would be my choice if the upstream equipment can drive the load he's connected to it. The XTA DS800 Mic / Line Distribution System is a high quality active distribution / splitter unit containing eight channels of processing in 2U of rack space.Each channel features one actively balanced input and a total of four outputs, two of which are individually actively balanced and normally connected to Front Of House and Stage Monitor consoles. ProMS2 Microphone Splitter The ProMS2 is a passive microphone splitter designed to send a mic output to two destinations at once without signal degradation or noise. 4-channel Active Direct Box and Signal Splitter with 4 XLR Combi Inputs, 8 Transformer-isolated XLR Outputs, +6/+12dB Channel Boosts, and -20dB Pad Switches. It will ensure you can drive every line at 600 ohms if necessary. Behringer DI4800A Professional 4 Channel Active DI-Box. Generally not a good practice to operate at absolute max on purpose.Įither way I agree the 5532 is a good choice for this job. Oh, and I just found out that he wants to split 8 separate signals, each into 6 paths which makes the whole thing a 48 output device if I wanted to use some crazy audiophile op-amps for the output buffers, it would probably cost a $500 or more just for the ICs I will discuss the idea with him, but if he insists on using buffers - does the JFET buffer suggested by GibsonGM offer better performance in any way then using a JFET input op-amp? It's much easier for me to get a tl072 than a discrete JFET (and cheaper too). Haha, my friend probably won't be very happy with the idea "ok, so we should probably just split the signal into six paths using a piece of wire", he probably wanted to hear something in the mold of "ok, so we are going to use this hyper expensive audiophile mojo opamp as a buffer, then use the best quality capacitors and resistors 5$ each and a golden wire"īut considering the fact that the input signal will probably be coming from a mixer and then the outputs will be fed to another mixer, the buffers probably won't be necessary as you say. As you have seen, the circuit has 7 wires comes out of him: - 1 through the switch to the batteries (+) - 1 to the batteries (-) - 3 wired to the male audio plug (left input, right input, ground input) - Each one of the last 3 wires splits to 2 wires, and each group of 3 wires wired to a jack socket (left output, right. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |